Wednesday, November 5, 2008

The Election.

Frankly, I'm disappointed. But I wouldn't have to write this note to tell you that. If you're reading this, then you probably already knew that Obama wasn't my choice. I also wouldn't need to write a note to say that I'm sure many of you are also pretty disappointed in outcome of this election, just like I am.

This is not to express my disappointment, nor is it to put on display the fact that many people share my feelings right now. There are countless articles, away messages, facebook statuses, radio broadcasts, blogs, and more to tell you that this isn't the outcome many people were hoping for. No, that's not at all the point. Rather, this is to tell another side and possibly help frame this election in perspective and context.

First, we have to remember that although we may be dissatisfied, Barack Obama is going to be our next President. He is not just the Democrats' President, just as John McCain would not have been merely the Republicans' President. No, Barack Obama is the United States' President. America made its choice. Sure, there were many voters who you could say were hoodwinked by the media, taken by the image of a young "rockstar" president, or voting for him based on color. At the same time, there were millions of people who voted for him because of his ideas. Regardless of whether or not you agree with Barack Obama, he has been elected.

Second, we need to see the many good things that this election represents. It represents freedom, for however long we fight for it. We should be very grateful that we live in a nation where everyone has a voice. We must also realize the massive number of people who were never involved before and have now taken notice and an interest in our Nation's future. Amid all of the talk about ACORN and voter registration fraud, I think it is sometimes overlooked that millions of people chose to become involved in our government in these last two years. This is not something to overlook, but something for which to be very thankful. And whether or not you agree with the candidate himself, it is something to be celebrated that our Country has progressed to the point where race does not mean a black man has any less of a chance than anyone else to fill the Nation's highest office. Sure, I would have preferred someone like Alan Keyes, Condoleeza Rice, or Michael Steele be the candidate to showcase our progress on that front, but the fact remains that our integration of all peoples and our recognition that everyone should have the equal opportunity to work hard and achieve their dreams is something to celebrate.

Third, the beauty of government by-the-people is also its weakness - it means that sometimes the minority just has to accept the decision made and move on. And now, those of us who did not support Barack Obama must do the same thing. Barack Obama will be the next President. Accept it. We would expect no less of those on the other side had John McCain won. Here are a few things that will not happen:

- There will not be an impeachment
- There will not be a violent, physical revolution
- There will not be an assassination
- There will not be some mass movement of people leaving the country to live in Switzerland

Finally, as crazy as this seems, Barack Obama just might be a good set of political cardiac paddles for conservatism. Many members of the GOP have strayed away from our conservative principles to the point where "conservative" is merely a word to put in campaign ads. I'm not saying that conservatives have all been wiped from the Republican Party, but I am saying we have a lot of work ahead of us. In recent years, "conservatives" have become so moderate that it's sometimes hard to tell them from the liberals. I think one major factor was we had power, and we were greedy. We allowed ourselves to slip into the same special-interest-driven politics that we were supposed to stop. I like the way John McCain put it:

"We were elected to change Washington - and Washington changed us."


In this primary election, we saw the Evangelical Christians finally become a sizable force in politics again. While we didn't win, the question that was asked by the media quickly became "Who will the evangelicals vote for?"

It seems as though you could call yesterday a crushing blow for Conservatives, but it wasn't. In the words of Mike Huckabee:

"Politics is not an event, but a process."


We did not lose yesterday, it was merely a turnover on downs, and it's now the Democrats' turn with the ball. It was merely another step in an endless fight for our beliefs. We've come a long way, but we can't stop. We must continue fighting and take our progress further.

So how does that translate into action?

1. We should pray for our Nation, and especially for Barack Obama.

We are instructed in Scripture to do so. And especially with so much at stake, we have to remember that God is in control above all Presidents, Governments, and other powers.

First Timothy 2:1-4: I urge, then, first of all, that requests, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for everyone—for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.


2. Don't become your own enemy.

It's tempting to lash out at others and blame people on both sides for the results. It's also tempting to make rash statements like "I'm moving to Switzerland," or "I'm never voting again," or "We are now the United Soviet States of America." None of those are true, so you are just wasting your time and energy.

Crises are not important. What shows character and integrity is how we respond to problems when they arise. So let's show some class in our responses to not getting our way.

3. Don't become disinterested.

There is a lot of work left to do. Take a break, yes, but take the irritation and frustration you have about losing this election, and translate it in energy to be used for winning the next one. For now, that means educating people about why lower taxes, limited government, free trade, rights for the unborn, the sanctity of marriage, and strong national defense are all good policies. In the somewhat near future, I'll be posting a lot of information about specific tools to help with that effort.

It also means finding more candidates, bills, and efforts to help with. In just two years, we have an opportunity to take back the majority of Congress, but we have to work hard at it. This presidential campaign was two solid years of media, but the campaigns themselves were started in 2004-2005. Work to stay involved, and opportunities to help will present themselves.

This Presidency is designed to change often. We did not just elect a new dictator, but just the next person in line for this job. In 30,040 hours, we will know the results of the next Presidential election.

Those hours are already counting down, and every second will count. Spend that time convincing others of the Conservative Principles that Ronald Reagan espoused, so we will be ready with an army of supporters when the time comes.

One more good quote...

"Be the change you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi


Work hard. Don't give up. Politics is a process, and the day we stop fighting is the day we lose.

God Bless,
- Andy Hudson

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Why Candidates' Positions on Stopping Abortion are an End-All for Me

I've talked about it a lot, but words can't really express why it's of utmost importance to me - more so than Iraq, or taxes, smaller government, etc.

As pointed out by Greg Cunningham,


"Abortion represents an evil so inexpressible that words fail us when attempting to describe its horror. Until abortion is seen, it will never be understood."

However, don't not watch this video just because you don't want to be uncomfortable. Ignorance may be bliss, but ignoring evil doesn't make it disappear.

WARNING - The following video contains graphic post-abortion pictures.



Monday, November 12, 2007

Chuck Baldwin and Mike Huckabee - The Rest of the Story

Largely because of his recent surge of support, GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee is now facing increasing criticism from liberals as well as his opponents on the conservative side. One notable enemy of the former Arkansas governor is Chuck Baldwin (Baldwin was the Libertarian Party vice presidential candidate in 2004. He is also a pastor of a church in Pensacola, and an outspoken conspiracy theorist.) In a recent article, Baldwin lambasted Huckabee on the issues of illegal immigration and taxes.

If imitation is the highest form of flattery, then Chuck Baldwin certainly seems to be paying some compliments to our founding fathers, as Mr. Baldwin’s article spotlights the idea that he surely holds his own “truths to be self-evident” – which might explain why he didn’t bother to research what he was saying.

The purpose of this article is to give you the other side of the story. A lot of the arguments used in Baldwin’s article could have been based on a hint of truth, but for the most part were just extravagant stretching of the truth or blatant lies. One example occurs within the first paragraph of his article. He contends that Christian conservative leaders (with the exception of Janet Folger) are not, and should not be, behind Huckabee. This falls into the “blatant lies” category. On the contrary, the majority of the Christian Conservative leaders that have endorsed a candidate have leaned toward Huckabee.

You can view a list of the Evangelical Conservative Leaders’ endorsements by candidate here.

Did he “Leave the conservative movement in shambles” in Arkansas?

The second claim in the article actually comes from Phyllis Schlafly, the president and founder of the Eagle Forum. She is quoted in the article as saying “He [Gov. Huckabee] destroyed the conservative movement in Arkansas, and left the Republican Party in shambles.”

This is a quote that has been circulated around the internet by some as if it were divinely inspired word that condemned Huckabee from ever becoming a conservative choice for Republican voters. Let me be very clear, I have a deep respect for Mrs. Schlafly, but her claim doesn’t carry much weight until she is willing to elaborate (which I have not seen) on how exactly there was damage done to the conservative movement in Arkansas.

One interesting thing to consider on this subject is the fact that there was no “conservative movement” in Arkansas before Huckabee became the governor. He was the third Republican to be elected into executive office in Arkansas since 1874. During the time that Huckabee was governor, the number of Republicans in the Arkansas legislature tripled. And let’s not forget that Huckabee won 4 elections in the democratic-stronghold state, all while being campaigned against by the Clintons. It seems pretty clear that rather than being left in shambles, conservatism saw a dramatic increase in Arkansas during Huckabee’s time as governor.

John Fund’s Political Fantasy

Another interesting thing was the article in the Wall Street Journal by John Fund – an article that Baldwin quotes as if it were Scripture. However, I won’t waste time beating a dead horse, as Fund’s erroneous claims have been thoroughly debunked in other articles (if you’d like to see them, you can see Huckabee’s direct response, or read Lucas Roebuck’s rebuttal to the attacks.)

Has Huckabee crossed the border on Illegal Immigration?

The next thing visited in the article is Baldwin’s attacks on Huckabee’s immigration stance. One thing that struck me about this section was that Baldwin did not conceivably give an account of what Huckabee’s immigration stance really is. Rather, he quoted several of the “elites” as they misconstrue the facts of what Huckabee did while in office. Chuck Norris wrote a fantastic rebuttal to these claims.

One of the criticisms thrown around is that Huckabee somehow “supported free scholarships for all illegals.” This simply is not true. What Huckabee did support was that we shouldn’t penalize students who were brought here illegally at a young age. These were students who had been in the school system their entire lives, and had not knowingly committed a crime. Also, there was never any support for “free scholarships for all illegals.” What was supported was that those students described above would be able to compete for the same scholarships as the other students, one additional requirement being that they had to have applied for citizenship.

Huckabee’s stance is very simple. He believes first, that we absolutely must secure the border. It is a national security threat to not know who is in our country, so the flow of illegal immigration must be curtailed. He also believes that any time an illegal immigrant commits a crime here in the United States and is convicted, that they should be deported – no exceptions. Huckabee also supports the training and deployment of 23,000 more border patrol agents, and a fence along the Mexican border. You can read more about his strong position on illegal immigration here.

“Taxes. Taxes is what bwings us togeva, today.” (The Princess Bride, but not quite)

The final big issue that Baldwin’s article berates Huckabee for is taxes. He calls Mike a “Tax and Spender,” a phrase first attributed to Huckabee by the Club for Growth (a.k.a. the Club for Greed) in commercials funded by one of Huckabee’s political opponents from his days in Arkansas. The group claims that Huckabee supported 5 major tax increases, which is simply not true. One of the biggest examples they love to use is the 0.825% sales tax increase, which cost taxpayers more than $400 million a year in order to complete a court-ordered education funding increase.

However, the fact that Chuck Baldwin and the Club for Growth conveniently overlook is that Governor Huckabee refused to sign that tax increase. He [Huckabee] complained that it was “maximum taxes for minimum reform.” Another fact overlooked by those making the attacks is that during this time the Democrats held complete control of the state legislature. That is especially important to remember in this case, because although Mike refused to sign the tax increase, the Democratic super-majority was able to override the Governor, and the tax increase became a law without his signature. That one example explains $400 million of the $550 million in tax increases that Baldwin and the Club for Growth attribute to Mike Huckabee. You can read about the other increases here.

Aside from the tax increases, another overlooked fact is that when not under Court order to increase funding, he cut taxes more than 90 times, including pushing through one of the largest tax cuts in the state’s history. In fact, with the taxes he had control over, he was so fiscally conservative that Americans for Tax Reform (A conservative anti-tax lobbying organization founded in 1985 at the request of Ronald Reagan) awarded Mike Huckabee the “Friend of the Taxpayer” award during his time as Governor.

This begs the question, if Huckabee was a tax-and-spender, maliciously raising taxes left and right to fund his supposedly “liberal big government,” why would he have been re-elected 3 times in a row? Does that sound like the kind of person that a conservative anti-tax lobbyist organization would call a “friend of the taxpayer”?

Clearly, the Club for Growth, as well as Baldwin, are either missing or ignoring the facts. How convenient that their arguments are based on opinion quotes from Huckabee’s political opponents. Regardless of his opponent’s rhetoric and blatant misrepresentation of the facts, Huckabee is a strong conservative who is backed by far more of the leaders of the conservative movement than his opponents.

Running buddies?

In the last few statements of his article, Baldwin claims that Huckabee encourages his supporters to suggest him as a running mate for either Giuliani or Romney. This is an outright lie. Mike Huckabee has never told his supporters that he would run with either candidate. When asked about becoming a running mate for Giuliani, Huckabee has only responded that he is not considering being anyone’s running mate right now, he’s running for President of the United States.

Mike Huckabee is a strong conservative with the record to prove it. He’s had experience making progress with a democrat-controlled legislature, and in each of his elections has beaten the Clinton political machine. Chuck Baldwin, on the other hand, needs to check his facts more carefully before spreading groundless ad-hominem attacks against the one true conservative choice that has a shot of winning the election.

God Bless,
- Andy Hudson

Evangelical Leaders' Endorsements of GOP Candidates

Here is a list of the candidates that have gotten support from Evangelical Conservatives, and which leaders support each. If I have missed any major endorsements, please let me know and I will add it to the list.

Mike Huckabee Endorsements
* Dr. Rick Warren – Baptist leader
* Baptist leader Rick Scarborough

* Don Wildmon founder/ former President of AFA (American Family Association)
* Randy Alcorn, Christian author
* Justin Taylor (Between Two Worlds)
* Joe Carter (Evangelical Outpost)
* Matthew Anderson (Mere Orthodoxy)
* Chuck Norris
* Mike Farris, President - HSLDA (Home School Legal Defense Association)
* Janet Folger of Faith to Action

* Jack Graham of PrestonWood Baptist Church, Plano, TX
* James Robison, Life Outreach International
* Robert Morris, Pastor of Gateway Church, Dallas.
* Keith Butler, Pastor - Word of Faith International Christian Center in Michigan
* Matthew Staver, Dean of the law school at Liberty University
* Dr. James T. Draper Jr. – Colleyville, Tex.
* Dr. Jerry Vines – Woodstock, Ga.
* Dr. Daniel L. Akin – President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
* Dr. Jay Strack – Orlando, Fla.
* Dr. Billy McCormack – Shreveport, La.
* Stephen Strang, publisher of CHRISTIAN LIFE magazine


Mitt Romney
* Wayne Grudem endorses Mitt Romney
* Bob Jones III also endorses Mitt Romney
* Dr. John Willke, founder of the National Right to Life Committee endorses Romney as well.

Rudy Guiliani
* Pat Robertson now endorses Rudy Guiliani

John McCain
* Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kansas), a favorite among conservatives, endorses John McCain.

Ron Paul
* Former Libertarian Party vice-presidential candidate Dr. Chuck Baldwin
* Former presidential candidate of the Constitution Party, Michael Anthony Peroutka

Fred D. Thompson
* Gary Bauer likes Fred Thompson. He recently sent an email out solely praising him.


Mike Huckabee Endorsements from Political and Evangelical Leaders

Mike Huckabee Endorsements from Political and Evangelical Leaders

Here's a collection of just a few of the many leaders that support Mike for President.

Evangelicals for Mike Huckabee
Dr. Daniel Akin- President of Southeastern Seminary

Randy Alcorn- Top 50 best selling Christian Author

Matthew Anderson (Mere Orthodoxy)

Keith Butler, Bishop- Word of Faith International Christian Center in Michigan,(His parish in Detroit, MI has some 16,000 members) member of the Arlington Group.

Joe Carter (Evangelical Outpost)

Dr. James T. Draper Jr. – Colleyville, Tex.

Janet Folger- President of Faith To Action and WND journalist

Dr. Jack Graham of PrestonWood Baptist Church

Chuck Norris, toughest man in the world

Dr. Billy McCormack – Shreveport, La.

Robert Morris, Pastor of Gateway Church, Dallas.

James Robison- Life Outreach International

Justin Taylor (Between Two Worlds)

Rick Scarborough- Member of the Arlington Group

Matthew Staver- Dean of Liberty University Law School, head of Liberty Counsel and member of the Arlington group

Dr. Jay Strack – Orlando, Fla.

Dr. Jerry Vines – Woodstock, Ga.

Don Wildmon- founder of AFA, member of the Arlington group.

Unions and organizations:
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM)

Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA)


Huckabee's Arkansas GOP Leadership Team:
Bud Cummins ˆ Former U.S. Attorney

John Paul Hammerschmidt ˆ Former U.S. Congressman

Asa Hutchinson ˆ Former U.S. Congressman

Tim Hutchinson ˆ Former U.S. Senator

Jay Dickey ˆ Former U.S. Congressman

Betty Dickey ˆ Former Chief Justice of Ark. Supreme Court

John Boozman ˆ U.S. Congressman

Dennis Milligan ˆ Arkansas Republican Party Chairman

Gay White ˆ Former First Lady of Arkansas

Lisenne Rockefeller ˆ Widow of the Late Lt. Governor Win Rockefeller

Jim Burnett ˆ Republican National Committeeman & Former NTSB Chairman

Reta Hamilton ˆ Republican National Committeewoman

Phyllis Kincannon ˆ Arkansas Republican Party Activist

Prissy Hickerson ˆ Former Arkansas HighwayCommissioner

Doyle Webb ˆ Former State Senator

Barbara Webb ˆ Former Saline County Prosecutor

Phil Wyrick ˆ Former State Senator

Carolyn Pollan ˆ Former State Representative

Gilbert Baker ˆ State Senator

Sharon Trusty ˆ State Senator

Denny Altes ˆ State Senator

Bill Pritchard ˆ State Senator

Michael Lamoureux ˆState Representative and House Minority Leader

Mark Martin ˆ State Representative

Jim Medley ˆ State Representative

Frank Glidewell ˆ State Representative

Bryan King ˆ State Representative

Beverly Pyle ˆ State Representative

Rick Green ˆSate Representative

Mary Beth Green ˆ Former State Representative

David Haak ˆ Former State Representative

Doug Matayo ˆ Former State Representative

Hoyt Johnson ˆ Former State Representative Candidate

Andy Mayberry ˆ Former U.S. Representative Candidate

Joyce Campbell ˆ Former State Rep. Candidate

Chee Chee Tamburo ˆ Former State Rep. Candidate

Wayne Bowen ˆ Justice of the Peace

Carol Lester ˆ Arkansas County Chairman

Mark Dye ˆ Scott County GOP Chairman

Ladon Copelin ˆ GOP Party Activist

Bernard Mize ˆ Polk County Chair

Billie Sue Hoggard ˆ Former State Representative Candidate


Iowa leaders and elected officials:
Bob Vander Plaats

Danny Carroll

State Senator David Hartsuch

State Representative Carmine Boal

State Representative Dwayne Alons


Bernie McKinley, former Mayor of Waterloo

Bob Andeweg, Urbandale Mayor

Brad Sherman

Matt Reisetter


New Hampshire Elected and Former elected officials
Senator Bob Clegg

Fmr Senator Russell Prescott

Fmr Executive Councilor Dave Wheeler

Representative Dan Dumaine

Representative Frank Emiro

Sheriff Wayne Estes

Hon. Ron Dupuis

Fmr Gubernatorial Candidate Hon Jim Coburn

Representative Jason Bedrick

Fmr Mayor Emile Beaulieu

Representative Sandra Reeves

Representative Nancy Elliot

Fmr Commissioner of Transportation Carol Murray

Fmr Senate Candidate Hon Nancy Wall

Representative Connie Soucy

Londonderry Town Councilor Joe Paradis

State Representative Julie Brown

South Carolina officials
State Senator David Thomas

State Senator Danny Verdin

State Representative Liston Barfield

State Representative Glenn Hamilton

State Representative Keith Kelly

State Representative Rex Rice

Former State Representative Warren Arthur

Dr. George Graham, Former Chairman of the South Carolina Republican Party

Ruth Griffin, former Executive Councilor

Virginia:
William J. Howell, Virginia House of Delegates Speaker

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Is it anti-Christian to go to war?

Is going to war to defend our Nation Biblically justified?

Is there any Biblical basis for war? Is it “anti-Christian” somehow to go to war for the sake of defending our country?

There are those who say that Jesus was a pacifist (though they may not use that word), and that we should follow His example and just love everyone and never go to war with anyone else. After all, in Matthew 26:52, Jesus said: "Put your sword back into its place; for all those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword."

However, I believe it is in error to say that Jesus was a pacifist and was against all war. A few things have to be established first.

The context of Matthew 26:52 is very important. In this case, it was Jesus rebuking one of the men with Him because if He did not go with them to be crucified, then the Scriptures wouldn't be fulfilled (Matthew 26:50-54).

Jesus is always in agreement with the Father (John 10:30), so the positions of one of them on war is the position of both. Secondly, God does not change (Malachi 3:6; James 1:17), so it cannot be argued that God used to allow war, but no longer does. With that being said, let’s look at what God says about war…

Has God ever commanded people to sin? Absolutely not, it is against the very nature of God (I Peter 1:16 – 25, I John 1:5, Psalm 98:1, Psalm 145:17, I Samuel 2:2, Isaiah 6:3, John 17:11, Revelation 4:8)

If God commands it, then disobedience is sin, obedience is not.

The reason that I said that is that it is that keeping it in mind is essential for the following examples to be properly understood.

First, David's Mighty Men:

In the Bible we have the accounts of David's Mighty Men - mighty warriors who fought to protect Israel. Notice they aren't called sinners, but rather that the Bible calls them Men of Might.

"These were the chiefs of David's mighty men—they, together with all Israel, gave his kingship strong support to extend it over the whole land, as the Lord had promised" - 1 Chronicles 11:10

And they, once again, killed many, but are not called sinners. Instead, look at what the Bible calls the chief among them:

"Josheb-Basshebeth, a Tahkemonite, was chief of the Three; he raised his spear against eight hundred men, whom he killed in one encounter." - 2 Samuel 23:8

800 men at once! Now if all killing is sin - that's a whole lot of sin right there. But notice what the Bible calls him, not a sinner, but "a Tahkemonite." Look it up, in Hebrew it means

"One who possesses insight and practical wisdom"

Killing 800 men - yet still being one who has insight and is wise. Bear in mind, however, he was not a barbarian that just killed people. Rather, he killed in order to protect.

Let's look at other examples. How about Gideon? God commanded him to lead an army to war in order to protect those who could not otherwise protect themselves.

God also commanded war in many other places in the Bible (1 Samuel 15:3; Joshua 4:13 Numbers 31:2, Deuteronomy 20:16-17, Exodus 17:16, 1 Samuel 15:18, and many others.)

In those cases, war was justified because it was used to stop acts of evil and to protect.

How, then, is it different to fight those who want to kill Americans?

It’s not. The concept is the exact same, we are to protect those who cannot otherwise protect themselves, and while war is never a desirable thing, it is often the only way to stop evil from becoming even greater evil. For example, if Hitler had not been defeated, how many millions more Jews would have been killed?

As for preemptive strikes, it’s the exact same idea. The only difference is that if you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not wait until after it has struck to crush it.

God Bless,
- Andy Hudson

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Mike Huckabee Contribution Video!

Hey,

I just made this video for the Huckabee campaign's contribution efforts, pass it around!





God Bless,
- Andy